Message boards : Number crunching : Success: Credit Awarded 0.00
Author | Message |
---|---|
MacDitch Send message Joined: 1 Aug 06 Posts: 10 Credit: 206,444 RAC: 0 |
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=341721474 on the link above you can see that the work unit has been marked valid but the awarded credit is zero - but only for me! What is going on?? |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Unlike other BOINC projects, the normal on Rosetta is that only one user is assigned a given work unit. The one you pointed out was assigned to someone that completed and returned it after the 10 day deadline. In the meantime it was reassigned because it had passed the expiration date. I'm pretty sure there is a fix for this in a newer version of the BOINC server code. But Rosetta's servers have not been updated in a while. Fortunately it does not occur very often. Your client looks to be using a very old version of BOINC as well. You might download and install the current BOINC version here Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
MacDitch Send message Joined: 1 Aug 06 Posts: 10 Credit: 206,444 RAC: 0 |
Unlike other BOINC projects, the normal on Rosetta is that only one user is assigned a given work unit. The one you pointed out was assigned to someone that completed and returned it after the 10 day deadline. In the meantime it was reassigned because it had passed the expiration date. I'm pretty sure there is a fix for this in a newer version of the BOINC server code. But Rosetta's servers have not been updated in a while. Fortunately it does not occur very often. So this is 'just one of those things' and is part and parcel of crunching this project? Your client looks to be using a very old version of BOINC as well. You might download and install the current BOINC version here It is, because it suits my needs - unlike the newer versions which overly complicate the working offline aspect. |
ramostol Send message Joined: 6 Feb 07 Posts: 64 Credit: 584,052 RAC: 0 |
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=341721474 When I follow the link I find these results: 373924681 985316 23 Oct 2010 15:31:01 UTC 6 Nov 2010 22:45:50 UTC Over Success Done 10,484.89 22.47 31.36 376550365 1360841 2 Nov 2010 15:47:28 UTC 2 Nov 2010 18:05:17 UTC Over Client error Compute error 551.44 4.98 --- [has received 4.98] 376581242 1303781 2 Nov 2010 18:09:27 UTC 11 Nov 2010 20:05:04 UTC Over Success Done 14,181.80 61.28 61.28 So everybody should be happy now — it just takes a little time… :) |
MacDitch Send message Joined: 1 Aug 06 Posts: 10 Credit: 206,444 RAC: 0 |
When I follow the link I find these results: Yep, all's good. Infact, all was good once I realised (had explained) what had happened in terms of teh single issue stuff. Even better now that I've got credit as well. :) |
dcdc Send message Joined: 3 Nov 05 Posts: 1832 Credit: 119,670,222 RAC: 10,815 |
If I recall correctly, there was a script introduced on one of the servers as a work-around for this which issues credit for these uncredited but valid jobs every 24 or 48 hours... |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Yes, I believe the credit granting script runs nightly. I didn't mean to say this is expected or tolerable behavior. It is less then optimal. It stems from a bug in the system... which I believe there is a fix for, but the project has not yet installed the version with the fix. So, was trying to explain that it's a known problem, and give some assurance that eventually the Rosetta servers will incorporate the code with the fix. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Success: Credit Awarded 0.00
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org