Message boards : Number crunching : 100 Teraflops
Author | Message |
---|---|
Jaykay Send message Joined: 13 Nov 08 Posts: 29 Credit: 1,743,205 RAC: 0 |
Server-Status as of 30 Mar 2009 8:11:42 UTC TeraFLOPS estimate: 100.588 for everyone who didn't notice that! now lets crunch towards 150 tflops! |
Chilean Send message Joined: 16 Oct 05 Posts: 711 Credit: 26,694,507 RAC: 0 |
|
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Wow! 1,300 new hosts on the 25th! Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
tralala Send message Joined: 8 Apr 06 Posts: 376 Credit: 581,806 RAC: 0 |
Well Einstein is down and Seti has not enough work to send out, so naturally there are a lot idling hosts out there. Let's hope some will stay. |
Michael G.R. Send message Joined: 11 Nov 05 Posts: 264 Credit: 11,247,510 RAC: 0 |
Well Einstein is down and Seti has not enough work to send out, so naturally there are a lot idling hosts out there. Let's hope some will stay. Indeed. It is my understanding that Rosetta@home can have a much bigger positive impact on humanity in the short to mid term than either E@h or S@H. |
nick n Send message Joined: 26 Aug 07 Posts: 49 Credit: 219,102 RAC: 0 |
Nice!!! and when we get GPU crunching maybe we can get into the petaflops range like a few other projects |
Gerry Rough Send message Joined: 2 Jan 06 Posts: 111 Credit: 1,389,340 RAC: 0 |
Well Einstein is down and Seti has not enough work to send out, so naturally there are a lot idling hosts out there. Let's hope some will stay. I would think that almost all will. They have just learned the lesson that a second or third project is mandatory to keep BOINC crunching away, and Rosie will no doubt be part of that mix from now on. (Click for detailed stats) |
rochester new york Send message Joined: 2 Jul 06 Posts: 2842 Credit: 2,020,043 RAC: 0 |
|
mikey Send message Joined: 5 Jan 06 Posts: 1895 Credit: 9,179,636 RAC: 3,204 |
Well Einstein is down and Seti has not enough work to send out, so naturally there are a lot idling hosts out there. Let's hope some will stay. Until Rosie lets them down as well. NO I am not thinking or even wishing ill will, just looking pragmatically. Rosie is computers, computers have issues, ie Rodie will have problems. Now like it was said earlier E@H and S@H have different expectations of achieving their goals than Rosie does. Therefore Rosie SHOULD garner more interest than either of those other projects!! Part of that problem is that EVERYONE has heard of Seti, until you start Boincing few have heard of ALL the rest of the available choices!! |
Gerry Rough Send message Joined: 2 Jan 06 Posts: 111 Credit: 1,389,340 RAC: 0 |
Actually no. Remember that the reason that they joined Rosie was to keep BOINC running since projects are often offline for different reasons. Rosie will eventually be offline, and they will give Rosie the same lattitude that they gave the others before they joined. They will simply realise that Rosie's offline-ness is normal and not fret a wit: they have now planned ahead and are reaping the existential benefits. Life in the BOINC lane, really! :-) (Click for detailed stats) |
Hammeh Send message Joined: 11 Nov 08 Posts: 63 Credit: 211,283 RAC: 0 |
TeraFLOPS estimate: 97.437 Back down to below 100 already, shame!! I have to admit, I am one of "those people" who have moved from Seti to Rosie after the recently Seti server failures (mass server failures I should say). To be perfectly honest, I don't mind projects being down, after all, computers do break. However, there comes a point in my mind when I draw the line, normally after my computers run out of work for 3 days straight! Hammeh |
Michael G.R. Send message Joined: 11 Nov 05 Posts: 264 Credit: 11,247,510 RAC: 0 |
TeraFLOPS estimate: 97.437 Welcome aboard, Hammeh! I hope you'll stay. From everything I know, the science that Rosetta@home does is unequalled in the distributed computing world (very cutting edge, but also very huge potential to help reduce suffering around the world). I suggest you go check out David Baker's journal on the science forum. It's will tell you more about what you are crunching. |
rochester new york Send message Joined: 2 Jul 06 Posts: 2842 Credit: 2,020,043 RAC: 0 |
|
rochester new york Send message Joined: 2 Jul 06 Posts: 2842 Credit: 2,020,043 RAC: 0 |
t flops are dropping somethings up :( |
Hammeh Send message Joined: 11 Nov 08 Posts: 63 Credit: 211,283 RAC: 0 |
Yeah i have noticed that recently, I can't see any clear reasons why! All of my WU's are being validated and credited as normal. The information on BOINCstats shows that credits are down quite a lot yesterday which could explain it. |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
SETI and Einstein are back online, and so machines with several projects are working to make up debt to them. So, their lack of work brought more machines to Rosetta temporarily exceeding their resource share. But it can also cause people to see idle CPUs and add Rosetta to their list, so new hosts are added as well. And that is part of the reason for the underlaying gradual increase in TFLOPs. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
rochester new york Send message Joined: 2 Jul 06 Posts: 2842 Credit: 2,020,043 RAC: 0 |
SETI and Einstein are back online, and so machines with several projects are working to make up debt to them. So, their lack of work brought more machines to Rosetta temporarily exceeding their resource share. But it can also cause people to see idle CPUs and add Rosetta to their list, so new hosts are added as well. And that is part of the reason for the underlaying gradual increase in TFLOPs. thanks for that explanation |
Chilean Send message Joined: 16 Oct 05 Posts: 711 Credit: 26,694,507 RAC: 0 |
SETI and Einstein are back online, and so machines with several projects are working to make up debt to them. So, their lack of work brought more machines to Rosetta temporarily exceeding their resource share. But it can also cause people to see idle CPUs and add Rosetta to their list, so new hosts are added as well. And that is part of the reason for the underlaying gradual increase in TFLOPs. Ha. That's my tux :D And regarding topic on hand: TFlops are dropping... fast. 78TFLops as of now. :( |
nick n Send message Joined: 26 Aug 07 Posts: 49 Credit: 219,102 RAC: 0 |
Well it was good while it lasted. |
Charlie Abrams Send message Joined: 25 Jul 06 Posts: 13 Credit: 6,870,894 RAC: 0 |
I think the Teraflops are plummeting for a different reason. I'm getting "no work sent (but there was work for other platforms)" - all of my machines are getting this message. My average is dropping fast, but I didn't do anything and the machines only run ROSETTA. Is there an upgrade that I don't know about that has to be installed manually to run new units? |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
100 Teraflops
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org