Cpu benchmarks

Message boards : Number crunching : Cpu benchmarks

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
malmal

Send message
Joined: 29 Nov 08
Posts: 12
Credit: 728,356
RAC: 0
Message 58398 - Posted: 3 Jan 2009, 1:36:02 UTC

I have a box folding for Rosetta.[ Tyan S2895] It was benching 3074 floating and 5595 integer mips.
Yesterday my hard drive died, so I replaced it and reinstalled xp x64 and boinc .
I also updated my bios from v1.03 to v1.06.
Now the cpu benches at= 2843 floating and 6776 integer.
Which benchmark is more effective in Rosetta folding?
My old bios gave a higher floating mips, but my new bios gives a much higher integer mips.
ID: 58398 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Paul

Send message
Joined: 29 Oct 05
Posts: 193
Credit: 66,421,410
RAC: 9,658
Message 58401 - Posted: 3 Jan 2009, 2:30:38 UTC - in response to Message 58398.  

The benchmarks don't provide very much information. If you move the mouse or have any background tasks, the benchmarks will chage every time you run them.

Don't be concerned about the benchmarks, just get back to folding. Every min. of CPU time helps the project.


Thx!

Paul

ID: 58401 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile DeMus
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 09
Posts: 10
Credit: 55,278
RAC: 0
Message 59559 - Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 13:22:08 UTC - in response to Message 58401.  

The benchmarks don't provide very much information. If you move the mouse or have any background tasks, the benchmarks will chage every time you run them.

Don't be concerned about the benchmarks, just get back to folding. Every min. of CPU time helps the project.



Yes, it is true that the values differ every time you run the test, but that is not the answer to the original question: which one is more important, floating or integer mips.
Does anyone know this? I also like to know the answer.
Thanks.


______
DeMus


ID: 59559 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
malmal

Send message
Joined: 29 Nov 08
Posts: 12
Credit: 728,356
RAC: 0
Message 59586 - Posted: 15 Feb 2009, 22:27:34 UTC

So would I.:)
ID: 59586 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile dcdc

Send message
Joined: 3 Nov 05
Posts: 1832
Credit: 119,673,616
RAC: 11,118
Message 59602 - Posted: 16 Feb 2009, 10:43:34 UTC

for the boinc benchmark the scores are taken with equal weighting, but that benchmark only indirectly affects your granted credit - your claimed credit is based on it though.

For running Rosetta however, I'm fairly sure the whetstone (FPU) is much more important.
ID: 59602 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : Cpu benchmarks



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org