Non CASP8 Work Units

Author	Message
carp Send message Joined: 4 Jan 06 Posts: 12 Credit: 599,555 RAC: 0	Message 53411 - Posted: 28 May 2008, 15:42:14 UTC Should we abort them or let them run? ID: 53411 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Tom Philippart Send message Joined: 29 May 06 Posts: 183 Credit: 834,667 RAC: 0	Message 53414 - Posted: 28 May 2008, 16:01:09 UTC you should always let them run, they ensure that there's work during a casp shortage and if you abort them, it will only delay the system, they have to be crunched by somebody! ID: 53414 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

David Baker Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 705 Credit: 559,847 RAC: 0	Message 53432 - Posted: 29 May 2008, 5:43:31 UTC Please let these run! believe it or not, we are still testing new method improvements out even though casp has started. for example, I'm very excited about some improvements I think I may have just made to the energy function, but I won't know for sure until rosetta@home tests on proteins of known structure are finished. ID: 53432 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

carp Send message Joined: 4 Jan 06 Posts: 12 Credit: 599,555 RAC: 0	Message 53438 - Posted: 29 May 2008, 14:38:20 UTC - in response to Message 53432. Please let these run! believe it or not, we are still testing new method improvements out even though casp has started. for example, I'm very excited about some improvements I think I may have just made to the energy function, but I won't know for sure until rosetta@home tests on proteins of known structure are finished. Thanks, just wanted to make sure I didn't abort useful work during CASP. ID: 53438 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote