Anyone else getting computation errors?

Message boards : Number crunching : Anyone else getting computation errors?

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
Leonzio
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 19 Nov 07
Posts: 8
Credit: 2,731
RAC: 0
Message 49979 - Posted: 23 Dec 2007, 17:26:04 UTC - in response to Message 49974.  
Last modified: 23 Dec 2007, 18:09:39 UTC

Thanks, I see that they are 5.89.

Leonzio, According to the records. It shows you're reported 14 wus, 10 of them were done with 5.89 without error, two were done with 5.90 and both had errors, and two were 5.91 and one you aborted and the other you returned successfully. So, if it's a 5.89, it'll probably run just fine.

here's more info on your returned work:

It's very interesting that a WU well done is a "5.90". :-)
What is the link from which [OT: "from which" is it correct?] is token that image?

Leonzio, I have software to extract and calculate that data. I input a host ID number and run it. It fills in the rest.

PM me if you have MS excel and give your email addy, I'll send you a copy of the software (note: it has trouble with Office 2007).

tony

I understand, and I thank you.
Astro, I remember you that the my computer OS is a Linux 64 bit.
I bought Windows XP and Office 2003 years ago, and I use them only on my notebook, when I work in archives and libraries. When I was young I loved the computer science and I programmed in "C", but I preferred as my life job to study some economic and political aspects in late Middle Ages (about XI-XIV century) Italy, my country. ;-)
I dislike MS softwares, as all other closed softwares, and however they cost too many money: Linux costs about 100 €, or 200 too, Windows and Office about 1000... -.-
ID: 49979 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
eric

Send message
Joined: 2 Jan 07
Posts: 23
Credit: 815,696
RAC: 0
Message 50001 - Posted: 24 Dec 2007, 15:12:19 UTC - in response to Message 49961.  


The link at this WU:
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=116854959
Well, There isn't the version.

Ahh, I see..... We won't be able to see the version until the wu is finished and returned. Only YOU can see what version Boinc will use to run that WU. If you're using a gui boinc manager, then it should show up under "application" in the "tasks" tab. If it says 5.90 then I'd just abort it and any others listed as 5.90, then they'll issue you 5.91 wus.

Thanks, I see that they are 5.89.


if they give you problems i think it is the best to abort them, and wait for some 5.91's


I am going to give it another shot. I just got some 5.91 WUs and I'll let them run to see if I get any more errors.
ID: 50001 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Rob

Send message
Joined: 21 Dec 07
Posts: 1
Credit: 2,207,183
RAC: 0
Message 50088 - Posted: 26 Dec 2007, 23:17:07 UTC

I also have recently received multiple "computation error" results which also brought up the WinXP "Report this problem" window when a program crashes. Happened on two different machines on two different networks.
ID: 50088 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Astro
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Oct 05
Posts: 987
Credit: 500,253
RAC: 0
Message 50089 - Posted: 26 Dec 2007, 23:23:24 UTC - in response to Message 50088.  

I also have recently received multiple "computation error" results which also brought up the WinXP "Report this problem" window when a program crashes. Happened on two different machines on two different networks.

I had the exact same thing with resultid=128948581, though it's the only one I've had in months. It did happen today like yours.
ID: 50089 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Robby1959

Send message
Joined: 10 May 07
Posts: 38
Credit: 9,298,741
RAC: 0
Message 50302 - Posted: 4 Jan 2008, 2:33:32 UTC - in response to Message 50089.  
Last modified: 4 Jan 2008, 2:54:39 UTC

ON two different machines both running xp pro one an intel 1.6 and another an AMD 1.8 said hey 512 not enough!! need 256 more , the 1.6 is running with extra memory and the AMD is waiting for more, work uniys should be taylored for each machine so older machines will be happy too
ID: 50302 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Robby1959

Send message
Joined: 10 May 07
Posts: 38
Credit: 9,298,741
RAC: 0
Message 50303 - Posted: 4 Jan 2008, 2:49:01 UTC - in response to Message 50089.  
Last modified: 4 Jan 2008, 2:57:15 UTC

Hey guys try a copy of memtest86 on CD for 9.95 + shipping and know your memory is good then /or download a copy of orthos http://www.overclock.net/downloads/138142-orthos-v20060420.html

if it errors out your double precision math ie your memory/machine can't handle the speed ( in my case I went from 3.4 to 3.33 ) I also have 2 1 gig sticks that will intermitanly crap out sometimes its ok just start a test[ blend - stress cpu and ram ] if it will run sometimes and not the other bad ram or slow it down a click at the time ....... makes for smoother crumching and the flacky ram well its going back on an RMA also 30 min test are plenty I let BOINC run during the test as well just do several a day for several days and see how you fair TEAM Highland Outreach
ID: 50303 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile dcdc

Send message
Joined: 3 Nov 05
Posts: 1832
Credit: 119,677,569
RAC: 10,479
Message 50310 - Posted: 4 Jan 2008, 13:27:10 UTC

i thought memtest86 was a free download?
ID: 50310 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Astro
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Oct 05
Posts: 987
Credit: 500,253
RAC: 0
Message 50314 - Posted: 4 Jan 2008, 16:08:56 UTC - in response to Message 50310.  

i thought memtest86 was a free download?

Of course it is free

http://www.memtest.org/

Perhaps they can't burn a CD or floppy and have to have it done for them???
ID: 50314 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Robby1959

Send message
Joined: 10 May 07
Posts: 38
Credit: 9,298,741
RAC: 0
Message 50317 - Posted: 4 Jan 2008, 18:02:33 UTC

YEA I did not mention the free download because most of my floppys have failed and when we tried it from a cd (iso ) it did not work . I felt it was not worth anymore of my time and I wanted it to work and work right so for 10 bucks it was done money well spent !! has any one pulled down orthos and fired it up yet?
ID: 50317 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Number crunching : Anyone else getting computation errors?



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org