Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with web site
Previous · 1 . . . 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 . . . 19 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
macko Send message Joined: 25 Jun 09 Posts: 32 Credit: 153,495 RAC: 0 |
So, the "active WUs" slowly melted in "Results" pages, I suppose for all users due to no updates since 16.09.2009. It looks like, that most of users are interested in credits, but not in results. Also it will be fine to have some short basic infos about the WUs proteins like it is described in Rosetta@home Active Work Unit(s) Log (ie 1bm8, 1elw and so on). Some of the WUs can be identified, but lots of them not. There is no update on this page since January 2008 too. |
macko Send message Joined: 25 Jun 09 Posts: 32 Credit: 153,495 RAC: 0 |
|
Chilean Send message Joined: 16 Oct 05 Posts: 711 Credit: 26,694,507 RAC: 0 |
Are you guys updating your BOINC version any time soon? The default 25% CPU threshold (BOINC won't run when CPU usage is above 25%) is really annoying when adding new computers and forgetting the setting is there by default in the newer BOINC versions. I can't change the setting online thru Rosetta (unlike Collatz Conjecture). |
Michael Gould Send message Joined: 3 Feb 10 Posts: 39 Credit: 15,381,370 RAC: 1,080 |
Greetings all! Is there a way on the Rosetta website to determine where an individual ranks for credit on the "Top Participants" lists, either sorted by RAC or total credit, without repeatedly having to click "Next twenty" until one finds oneself? For me, I'm guessing I would have to click about 150 times or so. Thanks, and by the way congrats to the German, Spanish, Uruguayan, and Dutch crunchers for your World Cup dominance! |
Murasaki Send message Joined: 20 Apr 06 Posts: 303 Credit: 511,418 RAC: 0 |
Greetings all! The best way is to use one of the dedicated BOINC statistics websites like BOINC stats. Currently you appear to be in position 25794 based on total credit. |
Michael Gould Send message Joined: 3 Feb 10 Posts: 39 Credit: 15,381,370 RAC: 1,080 |
Ah, that's an excellent site, thanks much! I appreciate you taking the time to point me there. By the way, one of you power crunchers on these boards could possibly make some money writing an overall guide to the whole distributed computing area, "Volunteer Computing For Dummies" or some such. There's a lot of information out there spread around, and it isn't always easy to find. |
Ross Parlette Send message Joined: 10 Nov 05 Posts: 32 Credit: 2,165,044 RAC: 0 |
I'm not able to u/l or d/l WU. Anybody else? |
Chris Holvenstot Send message Joined: 2 May 10 Posts: 220 Credit: 9,106,918 RAC: 0 |
Same here - check the server status page - it appears that srv1, srv3, and srv4 are down. Judging by the time of day they went down (COB PST) it may be scheduled maintenance time. These guys are pretty good - its the first time I have seen them down in the three months I have been playing with the project. |
. Send message Joined: 8 Aug 10 Posts: 2 Credit: 485,829 RAC: 0 |
Hello Chris, Thanks for your helpful message! I noticed my client didnĀ“t update the latest results as well. I have joined this project very recently, as in 4 days ago, so was a bit surprised to see some completed WU on my PC waiting already for a couple of hours to be processed. For other worried participants: go to your BOINC client, click the messages tab, scroll to latest message, if it reads something like "13-8-2010 2:36:36 Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down." it could be there is maintenance going on. |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2121 Credit: 41,179,074 RAC: 11,480 |
CASP9 ends, server goes down for the first time since CASP started. Coincidence? Cynical Sid... |
quel Send message Joined: 18 May 10 Posts: 2 Credit: 543,099 RAC: 0 |
Maybe a few too many new users from the slashdot or other news recently... It seems the server is starting to come back to life. srv4.bakerlab.org wasn't even responding to web requests but it is now. I was able to upload all my finished jobs but I cannot send the scheduler request to report them. Here is the output I get: 13-Aug-2010 12:47:58 [rosetta@home] Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 0 seconds of work, reporting 2 completed tasks 13-Aug-2010 12:48:03 [rosetta@home] Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks 13-Aug-2010 12:48:03 [rosetta@home] Message from server: Server error: can't attach shared memory And the tasks are still listed as ready to report. |
D Send message Joined: 15 Aug 10 Posts: 4 Credit: 109,082 RAC: 0 |
I'm having some sort of problem as of 8/25 around midnight EST. All of my computers have been unable to get new tasks. My solo and dual core machines have been out of a job and twiddling thumbs for about 6 hours now and my main machine is down to 50% and will be out of work in about 2 hours. I've clicked 'update' and 'reset', rebooted , lit incense and laid silicon offerings (jar of sand and old CYRIX processor) in front of the machines - all to no avail. They no hungry. Seriously, it just appears that scheduler has no new tasks. I checked the server status and it's all green. Internet connectivity is not an issue. I want to rule out hardware/software/user error as all of my machines are affected. I just want to be sure I'm not being the usual end user here and the actual problem is between the keyboard and the back of my chair ;-) If no improvement in 12 hours I'll post back. Thanks, D Team USA PS. On my main rig I noticed the last remaining task has been running for 47 hours and reports 83 hours to completion and the time to completion is going UP. Name: rs_stg0_lrlx_t315_run1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_19359_6103_1 Have two other tasks to complete. Then will reset to purge what appears to be a bad work unit. This is just FYI. PSS. In the time it took me to post this, 2 of the 3 machines poreviously reported have downloaded fresh tasks. I'm still waiting for the main machine to update. It appears things are just a little slow - not stopped. |
Evan Send message Joined: 23 Dec 05 Posts: 268 Credit: 402,585 RAC: 0 |
PS. On my main rig I noticed the last remaining task has been running for 47 hours and reports 83 hours to completion and the time to completion is going UP. Click on the properties tab and look at the difference between elapsed and cpu time. If there is a large difference then you are going nowhere very slowly. In these situations I close down and restart boinc which usually does the trick. |
D Send message Joined: 15 Aug 10 Posts: 4 Credit: 109,082 RAC: 0 |
PS. On my main rig I noticed the last remaining task has been running for 47 hours and reports 83 hours to completion and the time to completion is going UP. yup, CPU time is 1.25 hours vs elapsed of nearly 50 hours. I'm trying to pull the other 2 units which appear to be unaffected out of the machine and then reboot. Everything else seems to be normal. Thanks for the fast reply! D |
Murasaki Send message Joined: 20 Apr 06 Posts: 303 Credit: 511,418 RAC: 0 |
PS. On my main rig I noticed the last remaining task has been running for 47 hours and reports 83 hours to completion and the time to completion is going UP. Your problem may be caused by checkpointing problems on that work unit. Sometimes a work unit won't create a checkpoint/save progress so you do 4 hours work, switch to a new task, switch back again and find you are on 4 hours elapsed with 0 hours cpu time as it has gone back to beginning. Repeat that enough times and you end up with your situation of 50 hours elapsed but minimal cpu time. If the problem persists after you reboot then two possible solutions are to either turn on the "leave suspended tasks in memory" option or abort the task. |
D Send message Joined: 15 Aug 10 Posts: 4 Credit: 109,082 RAC: 0 |
PS. On my main rig I noticed the last remaining task has been running for 47 hours and reports 83 hours to completion and the time to completion is going UP. Update: 345pm EST Boinc software purged bad work unit on it's own. Que is now cleared. Have enabled 'leave suspended tasks in memory' and rebooted and reset client. I've waited about 30 minutes now to see if I get new tasks or downloads. Disk usage is only ONE MB as I have no data to crunch. All work units have now been completed. I have no tasks and my requests to update result in these messages: 8/26/2010 3:36:49 PM rosetta@home Resetting project 8/26/2010 3:36:50 PM rosetta@home Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 8/26/2010 3:36:50 PM rosetta@home Requesting new tasks for GPU 8/26/2010 3:36:53 PM Re-reading cc_config.xml 8/26/2010 3:36:53 PM Re-read config file 8/26/2010 3:36:53 PM log flags: file_xfer, sched_ops, task 8/26/2010 3:36:55 PM rosetta@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 8/26/2010 3:37:02 PM No general preferences found - using BOINC defaults 8/26/2010 3:37:02 PM Reading preferences override file 8/26/2010 3:37:02 PM Preferences: 8/26/2010 3:37:02 PM max memory usage when active: 2151.99MB 8/26/2010 3:37:02 PM max memory usage when idle: 2483.07MB 8/26/2010 3:37:02 PM max disk usage: 10.00GB 8/26/2010 3:37:02 PM (to change preferences, visit the web site of an attached project, or select Preferences in the Manager) 8/26/2010 3:41:00 PM rosetta@home Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 8/26/2010 3:41:00 PM rosetta@home Requesting new tasks for GPU 8/26/2010 3:41:02 PM rosetta@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 8/26/2010 3:45:07 PM rosetta@home Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 8/26/2010 3:45:07 PM rosetta@home Requesting new tasks for GPU 8/26/2010 3:45:09 PM rosetta@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks PS - thanks for having a look. I'm checking my client status and board every 15-30 minutes or so. THanks D |
Filip Send message Joined: 6 Jun 10 Posts: 1 Credit: 12,247 RAC: 0 |
You are not alone, same problem here. 2 computers, rosetta says no work available while other projects seem to work just fine! |
D Send message Joined: 15 Aug 10 Posts: 4 Credit: 109,082 RAC: 0 |
Looks like IMA back to 100%. All machines and cores have tasks to crunch. u? |
Paul Goodwin Send message Joined: 10 Aug 10 Posts: 2 Credit: 2,149,856 RAC: 0 |
I'm also getting no workunits on this machine...it's been a couple of days now. When I check, Rosetta says there's work waiting to be downloaded...but nothing comes when I update. :( |
Cdn_mtn_biker Send message Joined: 22 Jul 10 Posts: 1 Credit: 1,759,276 RAC: 0 |
Same issue here, my 32 bit dual xeon can't get any work units for a few days now, my 64 bit sometimes manages to get tasks but sometimes reports it got 0 new tasks. |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with web site
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org