Problems with Rosetta version 5.81

Author	Message
Jmarks Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 132 Credit: 98,025 RAC: 0	Message 48766 - Posted: 18 Nov 2007, 12:13:38 UTC 120690844 Name 1i8f__BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX-1i8f_-crystal_foldanddock__2257_49314_1 Workunit 109689498 Jmarks ID: 48766 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Voyager Send message Joined: 9 May 07 Posts: 3 Credit: 7,305,122 RAC: 2,426	Message 48768 - Posted: 18 Nov 2007, 12:51:59 UTC - in response to Message 48766. Last modified: 18 Nov 2007, 13:27:49 UTC 120690844 Name 1i8f__BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX-1i8f_-crystal_foldanddock__2257_49314_1 Workunit 109689498 On my AMD all units with 2257 fail due to 'maximum disk usage exceeded'. Only that series of WU's gives this error, so I abort them whenever they come in to avoid wasting time. To bad I have to do this, but as nothing I can do seems to solve this problem, it's the only solution for me. Crunch on. ID: 48768 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Luuklag Send message Joined: 13 Sep 07 Posts: 262 Credit: 4,171 RAC: 0	Message 48769 - Posted: 18 Nov 2007, 13:39:18 UTC - in response to Message 48768. 120690844 Name 1i8f__BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX-1i8f_-crystal_foldanddock__2257_49314_1 Workunit 109689498 On my AMD all units with 2257 fail due to 'maximum disk usage exceeded'. Only that series of WU's gives this error, so I abort them whenever they come in to avoid wasting time. To bad I have to do this, but as nothing I can do seems to solve this problem, it's the only solution for me. Crunch on. you could give boinc some more disk space to use ;) ID: 48769 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

AMD_is_logical Send message Joined: 20 Dec 05 Posts: 299 Credit: 31,460,681 RAC: 0	Message 48779 - Posted: 18 Nov 2007, 19:24:33 UTC This WU looks like it was successfully crunched twice, yet noone got credit. https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=106609323 ID: 48779 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0	Message 48785 - Posted: 18 Nov 2007, 20:32:19 UTC - in response to Message 48779. validate errors - so not successfull This WU looks like it was successfully crunched twice, yet noone got credit. https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=106609323 ID: 48785 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Speedy Send message Joined: 25 Sep 05 Posts: 163 Credit: 808,337 RAC: 3	Message 48786 - Posted: 18 Nov 2007, 20:37:08 UTC I'm not sure if this is a app related problem but this https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=120962799 was the result of a wu running for a little over a minute. I'm running Bonic 5.10.30 vista home preimum intel dual core 6320 1.86ghz and 1.87ghz, 2gb ram Cheers Speedy Have a crunching good day!! ID: 48786 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

AMD_is_logical Send message Joined: 20 Dec 05 Posts: 299 Credit: 31,460,681 RAC: 0	Message 48797 - Posted: 19 Nov 2007, 5:09:36 UTC I've had errors from hbonds.cc on some BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX-****_-crystal_foldanddock__2257 WUs: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=121101205 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=120920538 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=120696678 ID: 48797 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Conan Send message Joined: 11 Oct 05 Posts: 151 Credit: 4,244,078 RAC: 2,057	Message 48803 - Posted: 19 Nov 2007, 10:05:19 UTC This result gave me just 1.59 credits after 10,888.16 seconds, this is a return of just 0.53 cr/h. Not a very good return. ID: 48803 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Nothing But Idle Time Send message Joined: 28 Sep 05 Posts: 209 Credit: 139,545 RAC: 0	Message 48809 - Posted: 19 Nov 2007, 12:43:59 UTC - in response to Message 48803. This result gave me just 1.59 credits after 10,888.16 seconds, this is a return of just 0.53 cr/h. Not a very good return. Also contains "No heartbeat from core client for 31 sec - exiting". I've not had good luck when this condition arises. ID: 48809 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

svincent Send message Joined: 30 Dec 05 Posts: 219 Credit: 12,120,035 RAC: 0	Message 48815 - Posted: 19 Nov 2007, 15:47:46 UTC 1fe6__BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX-1fe6_-crystal_foldanddock__2257_77784_0 stuck at 7.315% on Intel IMac2/OSX 10.4.10. ID: 48815 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0	Message 48838 - Posted: 19 Nov 2007, 20:43:50 UTC - in response to Message 48815. 1fe6__BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX-1fe6_-crystal_foldanddock__2257_77784_0 stuck at 7.315% on Intel IMac2/OSX 10.4.10. What is shown for the status of this task in the status column of the advanced view? Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense ID: 48838 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Rhiju Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 8 Jan 06 Posts: 223 Credit: 3,546 RAC: 0	Message 48873 - Posted: 20 Nov 2007, 18:47:34 UTC - in response to Message 48769. Actually, I think this is our (the developer's) fault! There may be to much output from the run, and there's a maximum of something like a few Mb's allowed in the text output ("stdout.txt"). We're looking into it. Thanks much for posting -- we can't catch these kinds of problems on ralph! 120690844 Name 1i8f__BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX-1i8f_-crystal_foldanddock__2257_49314_1 Workunit 109689498 On my AMD all units with 2257 fail due to 'maximum disk usage exceeded'. Only that series of WU's gives this error, so I abort them whenever they come in to avoid wasting time. To bad I have to do this, but as nothing I can do seems to solve this problem, it's the only solution for me. Crunch on. you could give boinc some more disk space to use ;) ID: 48873 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Rhiju Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 8 Jan 06 Posts: 223 Credit: 3,546 RAC: 0	Message 48874 - Posted: 20 Nov 2007, 18:49:42 UTC - in response to Message 48797. We're looking into this one -- most of the failures (which are happening at a pretty low overall rate of a few percent) for BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX are indeed due to this error, which should be fixable! Thanks for continuing to post! I've had errors from hbonds.cc on some BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX-****_-crystal_foldanddock__2257 WUs: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=121101205 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=120920538 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=120696678 ID: 48874 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Claude Send message Joined: 27 Oct 07 Posts: 1 Credit: 376,375 RAC: 0	Message 48882 - Posted: 20 Nov 2007, 20:48:39 UTC I have a very high number of computer errors on one of my computers, and need some help tracking down the cause. Here is a link to the most recent example https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=121617732 Claude ID: 48882 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0	Message 48886 - Posted: 20 Nov 2007, 21:24:52 UTC Claude is running BOINC 5.10.8, on Linux, AMD X2 64, and he is seeing process exited with code 193 (0xc1, -63) SIGSEGV: segmentation violation Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense ID: 48886 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Ingemar Send message Joined: 28 Feb 06 Posts: 20 Credit: 1,680 RAC: 0	Message 48891 - Posted: 20 Nov 2007, 22:22:20 UTC MFR_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX_GB1_mutant_2286_18566 was crashing because the name of the return file was incorrectly specified. So the jobs ran correctly and produced an output but the client tries to transfer a file that does not exists. The job has been removed from the queue and will not be sent out more. With that said I apologize to everyone that we did not track this down earlier. It got under the radar. ID: 48891 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

drghughes Send message Joined: 27 Apr 07 Posts: 7 Credit: 6,346 RAC: 0	Message 48906 - Posted: 21 Nov 2007, 17:16:14 UTC Last modified: 21 Nov 2007, 17:18:30 UTC WU 121792337 (1bgf__ETABLE_ABRELAX-1bgf_-frags83__2312_648_0) ran on my PC with very few, maybe only 1, checkpoints. Fortunately I didn't shut down while it was running, and so I didn't lose any CPU time. drghughes ID: 48906 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

The_Bad_Penguin Send message Joined: 5 Jun 06 Posts: 2751 Credit: 4,271,025 RAC: 0	Message 48908 - Posted: 21 Nov 2007, 17:25:03 UTC Last modified: 21 Nov 2007, 17:26:46 UTC 1di2__LOGREG_ABRELAX_PILOT_ALL_FREQ_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1di2_-_BARCODE__2284_1395 1i8f__BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX-1i8f_-crystal_foldanddock__2257_33840 1igu__BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX-1igu_-crystal_foldanddock__2257_33840 ID: 48908 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Rhiju Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 8 Jan 06 Posts: 223 Credit: 3,546 RAC: 0	Message 48909 - Posted: 21 Nov 2007, 17:33:04 UTC - in response to Message 48908. OK, we're looking into this, especially the "1i8f" workunits. If you continue to see errors, please post at the message board for Rosetta version 5.85 (any new workunits since Nov. 20 should probably be running with that app). Thanks! 1di2__LOGREG_ABRELAX_PILOT_ALL_FREQ_SAVE_ALL_OUT-1di2_-_BARCODE__2284_1395 1i8f__BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX-1i8f_-crystal_foldanddock__2257_33840 1igu__BOINC_SYMM_FOLD_AND_DOCK_RELAX-1igu_-crystal_foldanddock__2257_33840 ID: 48909 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Beringse Send message Joined: 10 Oct 06 Posts: 20 Credit: 401,284 RAC: 0	Message 49148 - Posted: 28 Nov 2007, 20:48:51 UTC - in response to Message 48402. 11/28/2007 12:43:31 PM\|rosetta@home\|Message from server: Project encountered internal error: shared memory Strange, have not touched anything on the panel and I get this message. Please advise as I'm using this laptop away from home. Any ideas? Thanks ID: 49148 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote