Message boards : Number crunching : abbrelax WU's
Author | Message |
---|---|
Luuklag Send message Joined: 13 Sep 07 Posts: 262 Credit: 4,171 RAC: 0 |
i crunched 5 of these untill now and 2 came out compute error, a margin of 2 out of 5 is pretty high i think, any know probs/errors/bugs with these things, i have about 6 or 7 left in queue. |
PaperDragon Send message Joined: 22 Mar 06 Posts: 17 Credit: 2,461,169 RAC: 0 |
Just looked through my results list. I have 5 such units that have been returned, with one having a validate error. |
Path7 Send message Joined: 25 Aug 07 Posts: 128 Credit: 61,751 RAC: 0 |
Hi Luuklag, I have crunched 5 of these abbrelax WU's, non had a validate error. Perhaps you might post some of the result info, like: stderr out <core_client_version>5.10.13</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> # cpu_run_time_pref: 10800 # random seed: 2887153 # cpu_run_time_pref: 10800 # cpu_run_time_pref: 10800 # cpu_run_time_pref: 10800 ====================================================== DONE :: 1 starting structures 10672.7 cpu seconds This process generated 15 decoys from 15 attempts ====================================================== BOINC :: Watchdog shutting down... BOINC :: BOINC support services shutting down... </stderr_txt> ]]> Someone might find a clue. Path7. |
Luuklag Send message Joined: 13 Sep 07 Posts: 262 Credit: 4,171 RAC: 0 |
2007-09-26 18:37:37 [rosetta@home] Reason: Unrecoverable error for result CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1iibA-_filters_1782_540244_0 (Onjuiste functie. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)) 2007-09-22 20:12:04 [rosetta@home] Reason: Unrecoverable error for result CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-2chf_-_filters_1782_578101_0 (Onjuiste functie. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)) 2007-09-25 21:14:48 [rosetta@home] Reason: Unrecoverable error for result CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1opd_-_filters_1782_540247_0 (Onjuiste functie. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)) 2007-09-25 21:14:48 [rosetta@home] Computation for task CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1opd_-_filters_1782_540247_0 finished 2007-09-25 21:14:48 [rosetta@home] Output file CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1opd_-_filters_1782_540247_0_0 for task CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1opd_-_filters_1782_540247_0 absent and my PC specs if it might help 2007-09-25 15:38:37 [---] Processor: 1 AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ [x86 Family 15 Model 47 Stepping 2] 2007-09-25 15:38:37 [---] Processor features: fpu tsc pae nx sse sse2 3dnow mmx 2007-09-25 15:38:37 [---] OS: Microsoft Windows XP: Home Edition, Service Pack 2, (05.01.2600.00) 2007-09-25 15:38:37 [---] Memory: 1023.48 MB physical, 1.65 GB virtual 2007-09-25 15:38:37 [---] Disk: 73.43 GB total, 51.93 GB free 2007-09-25 15:38:37 [---] Local time is UTC +1 hours |
Luuklag Send message Joined: 13 Sep 07 Posts: 262 Credit: 4,171 RAC: 0 |
btw. onjuiste functie means something like wrong fucntion ;) |
Luuklag Send message Joined: 13 Sep 07 Posts: 262 Credit: 4,171 RAC: 0 |
2007-09-26 18:37:37 [rosetta@home] Reason: Unrecoverable error for result CNTRL_01ABRELAX_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1iibA-_filters_1782_540244_0 (Onjuiste functie. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)) found some more error stuff around the same time [09/25/07 15:38:35] TRACE [1456]: [09/26/07 18:09:30] TRACE [2012]: RPC_CLIENT::init connect 2: Winsock error '10061' |
Path7 Send message Joined: 25 Aug 07 Posts: 128 Credit: 61,751 RAC: 0 |
i crunched 5 of these untill now and 2 came out compute error, a margin of 2 out of 5 is pretty high i think, any know probs/errors/bugs with these things, i have about 6 or 7 left in queue. Hi Luuklag, I'm quit new with Boinc and its technical. I have searched in the Unofficial BOINC Wiki; http://www.boinc-wiki.info/Main_Page At [[http://www.boinc-wiki.info/index.php?title=Unrecoverable_error_for_result_%27%28result%29%27_%28Incorrect_function._%280x1%29_-_exit_code_1_%280x1%29%29]] I found some advice about your error message. Some information about the Winsock error '10061' can be found at: http://www.boinc-wiki.info/index.php?title=Windows_Socket_Error_%2710061%27 Hopefully it is useful for you. Path7. |
Luuklag Send message Joined: 13 Sep 07 Posts: 262 Credit: 4,171 RAC: 0 |
And the 4th wu that failed of this type i'am at a marging of error of 50% now, all compute error's. i think 50% is a little to much. could some1 look into these WU's https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/results.php?userid=205058 and ill upload my log's ill post the link later on. |
Luuklag Send message Joined: 13 Sep 07 Posts: 262 Credit: 4,171 RAC: 0 |
And the 4th wu that failed of this type i'am at a marging of error of 50% now, all compute error's. i think 50% is a little to much. could some1 look into these WU's https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/results.php?userid=205058 and ill upload my log's ill post the link later on. Link to the Logs: Logs |
Luuklag Send message Joined: 13 Sep 07 Posts: 262 Credit: 4,171 RAC: 0 |
And the 4th wu that failed of this type i'am at a marging of error of 50% now, all compute error's. i think 50% is a little to much. could some1 look into these WU's https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/results.php?userid=205058 and ill upload my log's ill post the link later on. some links to the result pages 1 2 3 4 for what it looks to me these are all programming bugs in the WU's so if this is true, could some1 tell the writer of this **** to check his lines. Or could at least some1 have a look at the programming. If it aint a programming error, ill take back my words ;) /hate on I hate it that i cant edit my posts, could some1 enable this feature so these message boards wont be spammed with useless post when a edit could do. /hate off Luuklag |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
And the 4th wu that failed of this type i'am at a marging of error of 50% now, all compute error's. i think 50% is a little to much. could some1 look into these WU's https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/results.php?userid=205058 and ill upload my log's ill post the link later on. you can only edit your post within the first few hours of posting it. after that its locked. thats what i have seen with mine. |
Luuklag Send message Joined: 13 Sep 07 Posts: 262 Credit: 4,171 RAC: 0 |
And the 4th wu that failed of this type i'am at a marging of error of 50% now, all compute error's. i think 50% is a little to much. could some1 look into these WU's https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/results.php?userid=205058 and ill upload my log's ill post the link later on. and failed WU number 5 :@ 5 thes abrelax_save_all_out WU's are starting to annoy me and i have 4 left in queue so i guess another 2 or 3 failed WU's ar coming your way guys. so be prepared!!! |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
And the 4th wu that failed of this type i'am at a marging of error of 50% now, all compute error's. i think 50% is a little to much. could some1 look into these WU's https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/results.php?userid=205058 and ill upload my log's ill post the link later on. just completed one with no probs |
Luuklag Send message Joined: 13 Sep 07 Posts: 262 Credit: 4,171 RAC: 0 |
And the 4th wu that failed of this type i'am at a marging of error of 50% now, all compute error's. i think 50% is a little to much. could some1 look into these WU's https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/results.php?userid=205058 and ill upload my log's ill post the link later on. as far as i can look back there came 4 , maybe below the list there is another 1 or 2?, WU's abrelax out good, but that makes me a margin of error of 50% :O |
Luuklag Send message Joined: 13 Sep 07 Posts: 262 Credit: 4,171 RAC: 0 |
and number 6 : 6 |
Luuklag Send message Joined: 13 Sep 07 Posts: 262 Credit: 4,171 RAC: 0 |
|
Luuklag Send message Joined: 13 Sep 07 Posts: 262 Credit: 4,171 RAC: 0 |
|
David E K Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Jul 05 Posts: 1018 Credit: 4,334,829 RAC: 0 |
I don't see any general problems with these work units. The pass rate is high as expected, ~98%. They have been running for a while now without any changes. You might want to try to reset and detach the project on your client and then reattach. |
Luuklag Send message Joined: 13 Sep 07 Posts: 262 Credit: 4,171 RAC: 0 |
I don't see any general problems with these work units. The pass rate is high as expected, ~98%. They have been running for a while now without any changes. You might want to try to reset and detach the project on your client and then reattach. then just lets hope it was that 2% of WU's that are estimated to fail that i got. Cause the error messages are telling something about false sin cos values etc.. |
Luuklag Send message Joined: 13 Sep 07 Posts: 262 Credit: 4,171 RAC: 0 |
I don't see any general problems with these work units. The pass rate is high as expected, ~98%. They have been running for a while now without any changes. You might want to try to reset and detach the project on your client and then reattach. i did the above, and guess what, i have another failed abrelax WU, this cant be coincidence? |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
abbrelax WU's
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org