Daily quota

Author	Message
chillerworks.com Send message Joined: 11 Oct 05 Posts: 10 Credit: 752,633 RAC: 0	Message 45487 - Posted: 26 Aug 2007, 19:26:19 UTC - in response to Message 45482. I alwyas thought Micorosft CPU limit was Physical Processors, not effective processors no of processors, though with Datacentre it may be different and they may be stingy ;)] Nope, you can stack up as many CPU's as you want, the limitation is with the OS itself and the effective # of threads ("cores") it can take. Chillerworks is indeed correct. No Windows version supports more than 64 cores. Unfortunately, Windows server 2008 ("Longhorn") won't change that either. Linux is your best friend ITPC ;) It's a shame if it's true with 2008. Especially that Intel is going to sell quad-core Xeons. So it makes 128 cores for Unisys ES7000/one. If Linux has been mentioned... I can run these systems on my server: Red Hat Enterprise AS 4 for AMD64/Intel EM64T Red Hat Enterprise AS 4 for X86 Red Hat Enterprise AS 5 for AMD64/Intel EM64T SUSE Enterprise Server 10 for AMD64/Intel EM64T SUSE Enterprise Server 9 for AMD64/Intel EM64T SUSE Enterprise Server 9 for X86 All Red Hats have no limits. SUSE says that max is 128 for v10 for AMD64/EM64T. If you have any experience, please, let me know which one is the best for BOINC/Rosetta. Mateusz ID: 45487 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Faust Send message Joined: 7 Sep 06 Posts: 14 Credit: 49,559 RAC: 0	Message 45496 - Posted: 26 Aug 2007, 19:58:29 UTC Last modified: 26 Aug 2007, 20:02:43 UTC FluffyChicken is correct when it comes to XP (and maybe Vista too). XP home supports only one chip, but no limit on the number of threads (up to 64, I guess). XP Pro supports up to two chips, but no limit on the number of threads (up to 64, I guess). Yes,AFAIK that's an artifical limit made by MS in order to sell lower priced entry based OS's. It's a shame if it's true with 2008. Especially that Intel is going to sell quad-core Xeons. So it makes 128 cores for Unisys ES7000/one. If Linux has been mentioned... I can run these systems on my server: Red Hat Enterprise AS 4 for AMD64/Intel EM64T Red Hat Enterprise AS 4 for X86 Red Hat Enterprise AS 5 for AMD64/Intel EM64T SUSE Enterprise Server 10 for AMD64/Intel EM64T SUSE Enterprise Server 9 for AMD64/Intel EM64T SUSE Enterprise Server 9 for X86 All Red Hats have no limits. SUSE says that max is 128 for v10 for AMD64/EM64T. If you have any experience, please, let me know which one is the best for BOINC/Rosetta. Mateusz Yes it is indeed a shame. but that market is 99% linux based for a reason tho. Basiclly it depends on your needs and ease of use so I guess your best shot is to consult a network manager or some other exeperienced users. I never worked with a SuSe so Im really not familiar with it. Ive worked with red hat before and it was rather nice and simple(yep powerful), but that was about 4 years ago, so I'm pretty sure much has changed since :) Faust. ID: 45496 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Ingleside Send message Joined: 25 Sep 05 Posts: 107 Credit: 1,514,472 RAC: 0	Message 45501 - Posted: 26 Aug 2007, 23:56:01 UTC - in response to Message 45398. The limit is 100 per day per host. I'm not sure why the BOINC message showed you 400. I guess I'm not positive which number is correct. Can't say I've run in to anyone that reached 100 per day without ending each one in error (which is why a limit exists by the way). It's 100 per core per day, with upper limit 4 cores, but with updated server-code #cores is project-configurable. On web-page, you'll see the 100/day per core. In the BOINC-client on the other hand, it's using the actual wu/day-limit for the computer, it's not per core. So basically, both ways to display it is correct. :) "I make so many mistakes. But then just think of all the mistakes I don't make, although I might." ID: 45501 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

chillerworks.com Send message Joined: 11 Oct 05 Posts: 10 Credit: 752,633 RAC: 0	Message 45572 - Posted: 29 Aug 2007, 19:37:30 UTC Just for fun... Mateusz ID: 45572 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

dcdc Send message Joined: 3 Nov 05 Posts: 1832 Credit: 119,821,902 RAC: 15,180	Message 45575 - Posted: 29 Aug 2007, 20:35:07 UTC what do you run on that monster (apart from rosetta!)? ID: 45575 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

chillerworks.com Send message Joined: 11 Oct 05 Posts: 10 Credit: 752,633 RAC: 0	Message 45576 - Posted: 29 Aug 2007, 20:40:04 UTC - in response to Message 45575. what do you run on that monster (apart from rosetta!)? nothing... :) ID: 45576 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 11 Feb 06 Posts: 316 Credit: 6,621,003 RAC: 0	Message 45577 - Posted: 29 Aug 2007, 21:08:28 UTC Neat! Let's see how high you can get the RAC for that machine! Reno, NV Team: SETI.USA ID: 45577 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

mdettweiler Send message Joined: 15 Oct 06 Posts: 33 Credit: 2,509 RAC: 0	Message 45618 - Posted: 30 Aug 2007, 22:18:53 UTC If you do find yourself running into quota limits for that machine, even with your settings set for 24-hour workunits, you can take a look at this thread, where you can find how to make your workunit lenghts go longer than 24 hours. ID: 45618 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

JChojnacki Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 71 Credit: 10,711,593 RAC: 6,960	Message 45642 - Posted: 1 Sep 2007, 3:14:47 UTC - in response to Message 45576. what do you run on that monster (apart from rosetta!)? nothing... :) Sorry for the language, but: FRICK'N AWESOME!!! ~Joel P.S. I would be really curious though, to see how many models that monster could crunch out per individual WU's, if set to 24hr WU run time. ID: 45642 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote