Hi, this application is pretty similar to the previous one (5.73) -- thanks for continuing to post and reply to issues.

---

Dunno if it matters, but running it, it says Rosetta Beta 5.76 LOL

I find it a litle confusing with the app saying 'Beta 5.76' since it been out since 12th/8

---

Have a crunching good day!!

is it a beta program or is it a finished version and they forgot to take beta out of the name?

this is the second "beta" program we have run now.

---

As I understand it 'beta' was put into the name to distinguish it from the other rosetta application. Apparently a version number is not enough of a difference.

well that would mean that it is not a finished version as such if it is a beta.
maybe mod.sense would care to comment or rhiju?

---

It's the version that has undergone testing on Ralph already. So it is "beta" in name only. I'm guessing we'll see a less confusing, but different name, once the 5.68 work is completed.

---

Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense

It's the version that has undergone testing on Ralph already. So it is "beta" in name only. I'm guessing we'll see a less confusing, but different name, once the 5.68 work is completed.

Thanks for info. Any idea when the work with app 5.68 will be completated?

---

Have a crunching good day!!

Yeah I was wondering why the app says Beta 5.76, Of course I'm running a 64bit version of Boinc 5.9.0 in XP x64 and the Beta app is a 32bit app too, A 64bit app would be nice of course.

---

Bad'OL MJSJ's PC Specs

WU error Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)

This computer.

I haven't reported an error for so long that I forgotten if this is how to do it :)

Hi!

My firewall (Zonealarm) has reported rosetta_beta_5.76_windows_intelx86.exe as trying to access the internet.

Why is it doing this?

Isn't reporting, etc. carried out by the BOINC application rather than the Rosetta .exe?

This may be a really stupid question! :)

17/08/2007 19:46:18|rosetta@home|Starting LFAB__BOINC_TOP5CHEAT_JUMPRELAX_BARCODE-LFAB_-_1947_2281_0

Ran for 26 seconds only.
Is it worth trying to get a restart on this one? Or shall I abort?
{5.76}

---

thats the install program for RAH Beta 5.76 that is the new RAH client.
Boinc is the application, but 5.76 also needs internet access to report and get work units. If there is something RAH or BOINC that needs to access the internet, let it.

Hi!

My firewall (Zonealarm) has reported rosetta_beta_5.76_windows_intelx86.exe as trying to access the internet.

Why is it doing this?

Isn't reporting, etc. carried out by the BOINC application rather than the Rosetta .exe?

This may be a really stupid question! :)

---

OK, this is starting to get annoying.

2 more results from a BETA release, 1 froze the rig the other has a validation error.

BETA 5.67

1st : cspA_BOINC_MFR_ABRELAX_CONTROL_1912_13731_0
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=100116577

Just how does this happen? And no credit! And It's done!

DONE :: 1 starting structures 13908.6 cpu seconds
This process generated 10449364 decoys from -542858906 attempts



2nd : LFAB__BOINC_TOP5CHEAT_JUMPRELAX_BARCODE-LFAB_-_1947_3886_1
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=100072160

Ran for 23 seconds, and froze the rig...waiting for permission to contact rosetta...this really needs to be removed, if it fails, move to the next one.

DO NOT freeze the whole rig up for overnight,waiting for permission, to run the debugger, COME ON.. You can name the app the same name and just overwrite it, one time permission setting!

Just name them all : rosetta_windows_intelx86.exe or a different name for Linux, and Mac.

You are changing apps so fast I cannot keep up with the permissions on my firewall. This really needs to be changed!!!

I really do have better things to do with my time than babysit computers for you!

---

BETA = Bahhh

Way too many errors, killing both the credit & RAC.

And I still think the (New and Improved) credit system is not ready for prime time...

This may be part of the problem.
"This process generated 10449364 decoys from -542858906 attempts"

Anders n

This may be part of the problem.
"This process generated 10449364 decoys from -542858906 attempts"

Anders n

That IS what I was pointing out!

---

BETA = Bahhh

Way too many errors, killing both the credit & RAC.

And I still think the (New and Improved) credit system is not ready for prime time...

This may be part of the problem.
"This process generated 10449364 decoys from -542858906 attempts"

Anders n

That IS what I was pointing out!

thats just the most absurd number of decoys and attempts i have ever seen.

---

This may be part of the problem.
"This process generated 10449364 decoys from -542858906 attempts"

Anders n

That IS what I was pointing out!

thats just the most absurd number of decoys and attempts i have ever seen.

Same here now long was the wu set to run for?

---

Have a crunching good day!!

Hi!

I have some troubles under RHEL3 and RHEL4:

$ boinc -return_results_immediately -allow_remote_gui_rpc
...
2007-08-19 14:20:34 [rosetta@home] [file_xfer] Started download of file boinc_description_file.txt
2007-08-19 14:20:36 [rosetta@home] [file_xfer] Finished download of file boinc_description_file.txt
2007-08-19 14:20:36 [rosetta@home] [file_xfer] Throughput 190 bytes/sec
2007-08-19 14:20:39 [rosetta@home] [file_xfer] Finished download of file boinc_mfr_aa3CSP_09_05.200_v1_3.gz
2007-08-19 14:20:39 [rosetta@home] [file_xfer] Throughput 107335 bytes/sec
2007-08-19 14:20:40 [rosetta@home] Starting cspA_200_BOINC_MFR_ABRELAX_PICKED_1987_1932_0
2007-08-19 14:20:40 [rosetta@home] Starting task cspA_200_BOINC_MFR_ABRELAX_PICKED_1987_1932_0 using rosetta_beta version 576
SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader

... and CPU is not used after that. What's wrong?

---

I am not sure if you need to keep track of all 5.76 errors but it is better that I be safe than sorry.

99969790 90651802
99961264 90629952
100059579 90676390

---

Jmarks

I have had two errors over the past few days:

100154221
99994896