Message boards : Number crunching : credit question
Author | Message |
---|---|
gamepr0 Send message Joined: 3 Apr 07 Posts: 1 Credit: 796 RAC: 0 |
i just crunched this WU https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=76621450 and if i see the time i crunched on it and the claimed and granted credit i really am dissapointed how are the credits being given on rosetta? |
anders n Send message Joined: 19 Sep 05 Posts: 403 Credit: 537,991 RAC: 0 |
Check this out and then ask more if you like. https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=2194 Anders n |
dcdc Send message Joined: 3 Nov 05 Posts: 1832 Credit: 119,688,048 RAC: 10,544 |
your claimed credit is so high because your benchmarks are impossibly high. Are you using an 'optimised' version of BOINC? The credit given is a reflection of the actual work done, so a computer running an optimised version of BOINC (which will give inflated benchmarks) gets should get the same credit as one running the stock version of BOINC, seeing as they both do the same amount of work (it's rosetta that does the work - BOINC is the management program so adding SSE2 support etc to BOINC makes no difference to the amount of work done by Rosetta.) HTH Danny |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
credit question
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org