Message boards : Number crunching : After Restart BOINC begins with 0 %
Author | Message |
---|---|
luQ Send message Joined: 20 Apr 07 Posts: 1 Credit: 1,465 RAC: 0 |
Hello, me and nearly all people i know from the ESL Team have the same problem: If the PC get restarted Boinc begins at 0 % with calculating. Even when the result reached 90 %, after a restart it becomes 0 % Sorry for my bad english. Can anybody help me? |
Tom Philippart Send message Joined: 29 May 06 Posts: 183 Credit: 834,667 RAC: 0 |
Did you check the runtime? If it's still as it was before restarting, everything is ok, the percentage will catch back. If the runtime is 0min 0 sec, there's something wrong, please check this. |
r0b Send message Joined: 18 Mar 07 Posts: 3 Credit: 27,955 RAC: 0 |
I have the same prob and elapsed time / time remaining get resetted, too. |
dcdc Send message Joined: 3 Nov 05 Posts: 1832 Credit: 119,821,902 RAC: 15,180 |
this is a known problem with Rosetta 5.59. The checkpointing is working ok apparently, so it's only the % that's restarting, and as Tom posted, and it will catch back up to where it should be if you let it. However, if the CPU time is also restarting then work is being lost. Of course, work done since the last checkpoint will always be lost following a restart. HTH Danny P.S. I hope ESL can keep up the good work! |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
just out of curiosity, would it be possible to include a save button to create a check point manually before restarting either ROH or windows? this is a known problem with Rosetta 5.59. The checkpointing is working ok apparently, so it's only the % that's restarting, and as Tom posted, and it will catch back up to where it should be if you let it. |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
...would it be possible to include a save button to create a check point manually? Nope. But they are talking about checkpointing about every 5 minutes, if your preferences allow BOINC to write to disk that often. And so that would mean on average you'd only lose 150 seconds. So, hopefully that's even BETTER then the manual system you suggest, because it would be happening for everyone, not just those that know to perform a manual step first. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
Tom Philippart Send message Joined: 29 May 06 Posts: 183 Credit: 834,667 RAC: 0 |
since ESL members often tune or overclock, is it possible that both of you tuned the shutdown of windows to accelerate it? It could cause the WU to be lost or resetted, try to close Boinc manually before restarting. |
r0b Send message Joined: 18 Mar 07 Posts: 3 Credit: 27,955 RAC: 0 |
thx for the hint, I actually use XP-Antispy and there is an option called "Quick Shutdown" I'll test it later, whether it helps turning this option off or not |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
...would it be possible to include a save button to create a check point manually? So the write to disk every X minutes is the saving of a data checkpoint to the drive? So by changing your settings to write to disk every 60 seconds for instance is doing what? |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
As with many things BOINC, it is a control over how much BOINC uses your machine. So, if projects are honoring the settings, it allows you to LIMIT the amount of disk access performed (not counting the swap space). However, it doesn't work the other way around. I mean setting a low value doesn't CAUSE disk writes, or checkpoints to occur. My understanding is that the Project Team is working on changes that will make checkpointing about every 5 minutes possible. If your preference were set to write at most every 20 minutes, then you'd be getting a checkpoint roughly every 20 minutes. If your preference were set to write to disk at most every 1 minute, you'd still only get a checkpoint when Rosetta is able to do so, about every 5 minutes. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
opernal Send message Joined: 26 Apr 07 Posts: 20 Credit: 4,598,641 RAC: 0 |
I'v got the same problem. All the processing task return to 0% which have been calculated for hours after system restarted. What a bug!! |
David E K Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Jul 05 Posts: 1018 Credit: 4,334,829 RAC: 0 |
It's just for the display and doesn't actually mean work was lost. The cpu time is the best indicator of work done. This minor but seemingly major bug has been fixed in the next release that is currently being tested on ralph. |
hrsn___ Send message Joined: 26 Mar 07 Posts: 5 Credit: 14,474 RAC: 0 |
fine. good 2 know :) OT question: are there any beta versions of boinc? ;) It's just for the display and doesn't actually mean work was lost. The cpu time is the best indicator of work done. This minor but seemingly major bug has been fixed in the next release that is currently being tested on ralph. |
Tom Philippart Send message Joined: 29 May 06 Posts: 183 Credit: 834,667 RAC: 0 |
fine. good 2 know :) yes, you can download them here: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/download_all.php I tested the most recent ones, they are very buggy, I wouldn't recommend anyone to use them for real production. |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
After Restart BOINC begins with 0 %
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org