One of the guys on my team is getting the 'x86_64 platform not found' error.

I've seen this posted a few times, but I can't find any concrete advice. What needs editing so BOINC downloads the 32 bit Rosetta (assuming that's what needs to be done)?

cheers
Danny

---

One of the guys on my team is getting the 'x86_64 platform not found' error.

I've seen this posted a few times, but I can't find any concrete advice. What needs editing so BOINC downloads the 32 bit Rosetta (assuming that's what needs to be done)?

cheers
Danny

I think he has to use the "anonymous platform" and download the rosetta app manually and creating a file. It is described here:

http://boinc.berkeley.edu/anonymous_platform.php

Thanks tralala - I've seen that link though and am still not sure what to do!

I know this bit:

<app_info>
    <app>
        <name>setiathome</name>
    </app>
    <file_info>
        <name>rosetta_5.25_windows_intelx86.exe</name>
        <executable/>
    </file_info>
    <app_version>
        <app_name>setiathome</app_name>
        <version_num>407</version_num>
        <file_ref>
            <file_name>rosetta_5.25_windows_intelx86.exe</file_name>
            <main_program/>
        </file_ref>
    </app_version>
</app_info>

save the above as app_info.xml in the boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta dir.

Except I guess the rosetta_5.25_windows_intelx86.exe is wrong for Linux! What should that be?

Then what?

cheers!
Danny

---

Thanks tralala - I've seen that link though and am still not sure what to do!

I know this bit:

<app_info>
    <app>
        <name>setiathome</name>
    </app>
    <file_info>
        <name>rosetta_5.25_windows_intelx86.exe</name>
        <executable/>
    </file_info>
    <app_version>
        <app_name>setiathome</app_name>
        <version_num>407</version_num>
        <file_ref>
            <file_name>rosetta_5.25_windows_intelx86.exe</file_name>
            <main_program/>
        </file_ref>
    </app_version>
</app_info>

save the above as app_info.xml in the boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta dir.

Except I guess the rosetta_5.25_windows_intelx86.exe is wrong for Linux! What should that be?

Then what?

cheers!
Danny

It's here:

https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/download/rosetta_5.25_i686-pc-linux-gnu

and I guess the name should be:

rosetta_5.25_i686-pc-linux-gnu

Another thing: Can your collegue just install BOINC 32-bit edition for Linux even on Linux x86_64 and then get the app the normal way? I assume under x86_64 linux 32bit application work as well as under Windowsx64.

thanks!

Just to check, is this right?:

<app_info>
<app>
<name>rosettaathome</name>
</app>
<file_info>
<name>rosetta_5.25_i686-pc-linux-gnu</name>
<executable/>
</file_info>
<app_version>
<app_name>rosettaathome</app_name>
<version_num>5.25</version_num>
<file_ref>
<file_name>rosetta_5.25_i686-pc-linux-gnu</file_name>
<main_program/>
</file_ref>
</app_version>
</app_info>

---

Now he's getting 'Message from server: No work sent':

2006-09-12 15:11:10 [rosetta@home] Requesting 8640 seconds of new work
2006-09-12 15:11:16 [rosetta@home] Scheduler request to https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta_cgi/cgi succeeded
2006-09-12 15:11:16 [rosetta@home] General preferences have been updated
2006-09-12 15:11:16 [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
2006-09-12 15:11:16 [rosetta@home] Message from server: No work sent
2006-09-12 15:11:16 [rosetta@home] New host venue: home
2006-09-12 15:11:16 [---] General prefs: from rosetta@home (last modified 2006-09-08 01:26:43)
2006-09-12 15:11:16 [---] General prefs: using your defaults
2006-09-12 15:11:16 [rosetta@home] No work from project
2006-09-12 15:11:16 [rosetta@home] No work from project

I'm guessing it might be something not right in the app_info.xml?

---

ok, i've suggested a change to this:

<app_info>
<app>
<name>rosetta</name>
</app>
<file_info>
<name>rosetta_5.25_i686-pc-linux-gnu</name>
<executable/>
</file_info>
<app_version>
<app_name>rosetta</app_name>
<version_num>525</version_num>
<file_ref>
<file_name>rosetta_5.25_i686-pc-linux-gnu</file_name>
<main_program/>
</file_ref>
</app_version>
</app_info>

I'll post back when we've worked it out incase it's useful for anyone.

---

All WUs erroring out with:

2006-09-12 17:12:39 [---] request_reschedule_cpus: files downloaded
2006-09-12 17:12:39 [rosetta@home] execv(../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/rosetta_5.25_i686-pc-linux-gnu) failed: error -1
2006-09-12 17:12:39 [rosetta@home] Starting result 1n0u__ROTLARS_ABRELAX_IDENT_LINK_BARCODE__1229_5804_0 using rosetta version 525
2006-09-12 17:12:40 [rosetta@home] Unrecoverable error for result 1n0u__ROTLARS_ABRELAX_IDENT_LINK_BARCODE__1229_5804_0 (process exited with code 13 (0xd))
2006-09-12 17:12:40 [rosetta@home] Unrecoverable error for result 1n0u__ROTLARS_ABRELAX_IDENT_LINK_BARCODE__1229_5804_0 (process exited with code 13 (0xd))
2006-09-12 17:12:40 [---] request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
2006-09-12 17:12:40 [rosetta@home] Computation for result 1n0u__ROTLARS_ABRELAX_IDENT_LINK_BARCODE__1229_5804_0 finished

host is: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/sh...?hostid=303630

Any ideas?

---

All WUs erroring out with:

2006-09-12 17:12:39 [---] request_reschedule_cpus: files downloaded
2006-09-12 17:12:39 [rosetta@home] execv(../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/rosetta_5.25_i686-pc-linux-gnu) failed: error -1
2006-09-12 17:12:39 [rosetta@home] Starting result 1n0u__ROTLARS_ABRELAX_IDENT_LINK_BARCODE__1229_5804_0 using rosetta version 525
2006-09-12 17:12:40 [rosetta@home] Unrecoverable error for result 1n0u__ROTLARS_ABRELAX_IDENT_LINK_BARCODE__1229_5804_0 (process exited with code 13 (0xd))
2006-09-12 17:12:40 [rosetta@home] Unrecoverable error for result 1n0u__ROTLARS_ABRELAX_IDENT_LINK_BARCODE__1229_5804_0 (process exited with code 13 (0xd))
2006-09-12 17:12:40 [---] request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
2006-09-12 17:12:40 [rosetta@home] Computation for result 1n0u__ROTLARS_ABRELAX_IDENT_LINK_BARCODE__1229_5804_0 finished

host is: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/sh...?hostid=303630

Any ideas?

You're probably running with selinux extensions (security enabled linux). There's a thread on that subject in "questions and answers" under the "linux/unix" heading, with some suggestions on how to solve it [setting selinux=0 on the command-line when booting the linux machine is one way to "get rid of" the selinux - assuming you have no particular need for security enhancements in the first place, of course].

--
Mats

---

I know this is an older Thread but if someone is still searching for a way to crunch rosetta with 64 bit Linux, like I was searching...

I wrote a little HowTo in the BOINC Synergy Forum.
You can find it here: http://www.boincsynergy.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=69800#69800

---

I know this is an older Thread but if someone is still searching for a way to crunch rosetta with 64 bit Linux, like I was searching...

I wrote a little HowTo in the BOINC Synergy Forum.
You can find it here: http://www.boincsynergy.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=69800#69800

Not to detract from Stefans efforts, but given the frequency that the Rosetta app's can change sometimes - is it really too much trouble for the dev's to recognise the 64bit platform and send out the 32bit app?

---

I just added linux and windows 64bit platforms to ralph. The apps are copies of the 32bit versions. If you have a 64bit boinc client, please join the ralph test project if you haven't already.

http://ralph.bakerlab.org

I just added linux and windows 64bit platforms to ralph. The apps are copies of the 32bit versions. If you have a 64bit boinc client, please join the ralph test project if you haven't already.

http://ralph.bakerlab.org

incoming :D

I just added linux and windows 64bit platforms to ralph. The apps are copies of the 32bit versions. If you have a 64bit boinc client, please join the ralph test project if you haven't already.

http://ralph.bakerlab.org

Sweet - my 3 64bit boxes now have their first RALPH wus

---

I just added linux and windows 64bit platforms to ralph. The apps are copies of the 32bit versions. If you have a 64bit boinc client, please join the ralph test project if you haven't already.

http://ralph.bakerlab.org

Before I jump yet another project I'd like to know wether ralph@home also contributes to scientific goal of Rosetta or is it just to test new applications? If it's the latter, I'll just stick to anonymous platform for now...

---

Metod ...

It directly test the rosetta@home client for bugs before it comes here
and tests other things they are doing before it is used onthe rosetta@home website.

It is also used to pre test now job types before the are released on rosetta@home.

So yes it is directly contributing to same goal as rosetta just in a slightyl different way.
If bugs are found quicker there is less chance of bug being released at here, so asaving everybody time and energy.

I'm not sure if they use the results they get there in the statistical overview, I doubt it but it does give them the first insight into what is happening. time put in there (which is not a lot as tasks are sparse) is certainly not wasted in the overall scheme of things.

---

Team mauisun.org

I started getting Rosetta last night on my Pentium D with 64 bit Ubuntu 6.10 and Augustine's 64 bit BOINC. I hadn't got around to putting an app_info.xml in and when I looked at the applications page, I see that they do have 64 bit apps for Windows and Linux now. But there don't seem to be any announcements about it?

May 7, 2007
We forgot to mention that version 5.64 also includes 64bit applications for windows and linux platforms. These rosetta applications are copies of the 32bit version.

On the front page. No idea of the time of announcment though.

---

Team mauisun.org