Lowest accepted energy????

Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : Lowest accepted energy????

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile William Senn
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 19 Dec 05
Posts: 1
Credit: 359,289
RAC: 0
Message 10477 - Posted: 5 Feb 2006, 13:51:23 UTC

I just witnessed a lowest accepted enery of around -270 with an RMSD of around 8.5.....

Unfortunately the program exited with a calculation error (0xC0000005)...

Barcode_30_1elwA_299_3522_0

Did I witness something wonderfull or was it just a blip?

William Senn

ID: 10477 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
[DPC] Team ColdFusion~Osi

Send message
Joined: 17 Jan 06
Posts: 2
Credit: 60,452
RAC: 0
Message 10479 - Posted: 5 Feb 2006, 16:24:48 UTC - in response to Message 10477.  

I just witnessed a lowest accepted enery of around -270 with an RMSD of around 8.5.....

Unfortunately the program exited with a calculation error (0xC0000005)...

Barcode_30_1elwA_299_3522_0

Did I witness something wonderfull or was it just a blip?

William Senn


Got the same
ID: 10479 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
David Baker
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 705
Credit: 559,847
RAC: 0
Message 10492 - Posted: 6 Feb 2006, 4:20:56 UTC

Interesting--will let you know as soon as we have analyzed the data coming in for this protein. thanks for the tip. David

ID: 10492 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
[DPC] Team ColdFusion~Osi

Send message
Joined: 17 Jan 06
Posts: 2
Credit: 60,452
RAC: 0
Message 10506 - Posted: 6 Feb 2006, 15:20:25 UTC - in response to Message 10479.  

I just witnessed a lowest accepted enery of around -270 with an RMSD of around 8.5.....

Unfortunately the program exited with a calculation error (0xC0000005)...

Barcode_30_1elwA_299_3522_0

Did I witness something wonderfull or was it just a blip?

William Senn


Got the same


what i was trying to say, i got around the same energy of -270 in the BARCODE_30_1elwA serie
ID: 10506 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
wizclone

Send message
Joined: 28 Nov 05
Posts: 4
Credit: 15,368,007
RAC: 0
Message 10628 - Posted: 10 Feb 2006, 15:12:32 UTC

i am calculating BARCODE_30-1acf_299-24362 and now i have something like -270 and RMS of about 11.xx
ID: 10628 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
David Baker
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 705
Credit: 559,847
RAC: 0
Message 10630 - Posted: 10 Feb 2006, 15:40:50 UTC - in response to Message 10628.  

i am calculating BARCODE_30-1acf_299-24362 and now i have something like -270 and RMS of about 11.xx


I think this is normal behavior. We've been folding somewhat larger proteins in the last two weeks, and with more atoms interacting the energies can be lower than in the earlier set (the interaction energy between two atoms not too far apart is usually negative, and there are many more atom pairs in larger proteins).

I hope you will see a run with still lower energy AND low rmsd!
ID: 10630 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Kevin

Send message
Joined: 15 Jan 06
Posts: 21
Credit: 109,496
RAC: 0
Message 10871 - Posted: 18 Feb 2006, 5:54:35 UTC

I just saw an energy of -300 and an RMSD of 0.3. This is on BARCODE_30_1elwA_NATIVE_313_309. This is the lowest energy and RMSD I have seen of any of the units I have crunched.
ID: 10871 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Kevin

Send message
Joined: 15 Jan 06
Posts: 21
Credit: 109,496
RAC: 0
Message 10872 - Posted: 18 Feb 2006, 5:54:39 UTC

I just saw an energy of -300 and an RMSD of 0.3. This is on BARCODE_30_1elwA_NATIVE_313_309. This is the lowest energy and RMSD I have seen of any of the units I have crunched.
ID: 10872 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Rhiju
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 8 Jan 06
Posts: 223
Credit: 3,546
RAC: 0
Message 11165 - Posted: 22 Feb 2006, 0:11:36 UTC

There's (unfortunately) a rather mundane explanation for the RMSD of 0.3. We need
to do a few runs that "cheat" and start with the native fold -- it tells us what energies we're shooting for. That's what the "NATIVE" in "BARCODE_30_1elwA_NATIVE_313_309" refers to. But keep on the lookout for further conformations with small RMSD's! It wouldn't surprise me if the immense sampling made possible by BOINC gives us structures that good.
ID: 11165 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile anders n

Send message
Joined: 19 Sep 05
Posts: 403
Credit: 537,991
RAC: 0
Message 15395 - Posted: 3 May 2006, 8:19:28 UTC
Last modified: 3 May 2006, 8:47:20 UTC

How low can the energi get?

I have -502 on my screen.

This wu https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=18900898


Anders n


Edit now -517
ID: 15395 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : Lowest accepted energy????



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org