Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : Lowest accepted energy????
Author | Message |
---|---|
William Senn Send message Joined: 19 Dec 05 Posts: 1 Credit: 359,289 RAC: 0 |
I just witnessed a lowest accepted enery of around -270 with an RMSD of around 8.5..... Unfortunately the program exited with a calculation error (0xC0000005)... Barcode_30_1elwA_299_3522_0 Did I witness something wonderfull or was it just a blip? William Senn |
[DPC] Team ColdFusion~Osi Send message Joined: 17 Jan 06 Posts: 2 Credit: 60,452 RAC: 0 |
I just witnessed a lowest accepted enery of around -270 with an RMSD of around 8.5..... Got the same |
David Baker Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 705 Credit: 559,847 RAC: 0 |
Interesting--will let you know as soon as we have analyzed the data coming in for this protein. thanks for the tip. David |
[DPC] Team ColdFusion~Osi Send message Joined: 17 Jan 06 Posts: 2 Credit: 60,452 RAC: 0 |
I just witnessed a lowest accepted enery of around -270 with an RMSD of around 8.5..... what i was trying to say, i got around the same energy of -270 in the BARCODE_30_1elwA serie |
wizclone Send message Joined: 28 Nov 05 Posts: 4 Credit: 15,368,007 RAC: 0 |
i am calculating BARCODE_30-1acf_299-24362 and now i have something like -270 and RMS of about 11.xx |
David Baker Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 705 Credit: 559,847 RAC: 0 |
i am calculating BARCODE_30-1acf_299-24362 and now i have something like -270 and RMS of about 11.xx I think this is normal behavior. We've been folding somewhat larger proteins in the last two weeks, and with more atoms interacting the energies can be lower than in the earlier set (the interaction energy between two atoms not too far apart is usually negative, and there are many more atom pairs in larger proteins). I hope you will see a run with still lower energy AND low rmsd! |
Kevin Send message Joined: 15 Jan 06 Posts: 21 Credit: 109,496 RAC: 0 |
I just saw an energy of -300 and an RMSD of 0.3. This is on BARCODE_30_1elwA_NATIVE_313_309. This is the lowest energy and RMSD I have seen of any of the units I have crunched. |
Kevin Send message Joined: 15 Jan 06 Posts: 21 Credit: 109,496 RAC: 0 |
I just saw an energy of -300 and an RMSD of 0.3. This is on BARCODE_30_1elwA_NATIVE_313_309. This is the lowest energy and RMSD I have seen of any of the units I have crunched. |
Rhiju Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 8 Jan 06 Posts: 223 Credit: 3,546 RAC: 0 |
There's (unfortunately) a rather mundane explanation for the RMSD of 0.3. We need to do a few runs that "cheat" and start with the native fold -- it tells us what energies we're shooting for. That's what the "NATIVE" in "BARCODE_30_1elwA_NATIVE_313_309" refers to. But keep on the lookout for further conformations with small RMSD's! It wouldn't surprise me if the immense sampling made possible by BOINC gives us structures that good. |
anders n Send message Joined: 19 Sep 05 Posts: 403 Credit: 537,991 RAC: 0 |
How low can the energi get? I have -502 on my screen. This wu https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=18900898 Anders n Edit now -517 |
Message boards :
Rosetta@home Science :
Lowest accepted energy????
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org