153409278 140023066 4 Apr 2008 14:08:28 UTC 7 Apr 2008 20:24:35 UTC Over Success Done 13,740.86 57.10 52.01
153405349 140019344 4 Apr 2008 13:47:19 UTC 7 Apr 2008 18:39:14 UTC Over Success Done 13,667.34 56.80 52.01
153355441 139973958 4 Apr 2008 9:20:47 UTC 7 Apr 2008 15:54:55 UTC Over Success Done 13,140.11 54.61 52.01
153349191 139968568 4 Apr 2008 8:45:37 UTC 7 Apr 2008 14:39:39 UTC Over Success Done 13,398.94 55.68 52.01
153309984 139932620 4 Apr 2008 4:56:00 UTC 7 Apr 2008 12:25:52 UTC Over Success Done 13,726.11 57.04 52.01

My last five tasks.

WU name for all of these is: FRA_t035_CAPRI15_hom1dyoB_2_IGNORE_THE_RESTt035_2_t035.1dyo.second_round_starting_pdb.pdb_3020

followed by a unique WU number.

Granted credit is based on the average credit claimed per model by those that have already reported results. The average rolls forward as the work progresses. This credit per model figure does vary slightly, especially for the first few results returned, but quickly stablizes.

Here are your results:

153409278 WU 344009, models 10
153405349 WU 342077, models 10
153355441 WU 318327, models 10
153349191 WU 315448, models 10
153309984 WU 296954, models 10

They all completed 10 models on the same protein, for the same run of tests and all received the same credit for that completed work. Looks just as I'd expect.

And the fact that your WUs were reported back over the course of 8 hours further confirms how steady that average credit claim per model becomes. It was identical for that entire period of time.

Credit is granted based on work completed. So the small variation in the time it took you to complete the 10 models impacts your claimed credit, but not what you are granted.

---

Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense

and if one of them had squeezed 11 models into your run-time preference (14k seconds/4hrs) then you would've received 57.21 (5.201 * 11) for that task.

HTH
Danny

---