Reissued work

Author	Message
arcturus Send message Joined: 22 Sep 05 Posts: 16 Credit: 525,440 RAC: 0	Message 1435 - Posted: 17 Oct 2005, 19:50:39 UTC Last modified: 17 Oct 2005, 19:51:58 UTC Last 10 completed work units (successfully done) were previously sent out and all showed client errors. Looks like the project is recycling. ID: 1435 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

scsimodo Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 93 Credit: 946,359 RAC: 0	Message 1436 - Posted: 17 Oct 2005, 20:13:35 UTC - in response to Message 1435. Last 10 completed work units (successfully done) were previously sent out and all showed client errors. Looks like the project is recycling. Huh? Recycling? Rosetta needs at least one valid result per WU. If a client returns a WU with errors, the WU will be sent out to the next client. What's so strange in this beaviour? scsimodo ID: 1436 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

arcturus Send message Joined: 22 Sep 05 Posts: 16 Credit: 525,440 RAC: 0	Message 1438 - Posted: 17 Oct 2005, 20:28:29 UTC Who said anything's strange? Just a plain simple observation. ID: 1438 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rbpeake Send message Joined: 25 Sep 05 Posts: 168 Credit: 247,828 RAC: 0	Message 1440 - Posted: 17 Oct 2005, 20:30:19 UTC - in response to Message 1436. If a client returns a WU with errors, the WU will be sent out to the next client. What's so strange in this beaviour? scsimodo I have received a number of these units that previously failed for whatever reason, and have successfully processed them. :) Regards, Bob P. ID: 1440 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

scsimodo Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 93 Credit: 946,359 RAC: 0	Message 1441 - Posted: 17 Oct 2005, 20:39:06 UTC - in response to Message 1438. Who said anything's strange? Just a plain simple observation. Well..., your post describes a normal behaviour of every Boinc project. The fact that you started a thread made me think you are concerned of a "double crunching" of WUs. That's what I associate with "recycling". Sorry if I misunderstood you... ID: 1441 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote