Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v2 @ 2.60GHz Performance

Author	Message
Mike Send message Joined: 7 Feb 18 Posts: 5 Credit: 52,722,985 RAC: 0	Message 88255 - Posted: 10 Feb 2018, 4:44:06 UTC Can anyone tell me why the Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v2 @ 2.60GHz has such a higher score per clock and per computer on the cpu performance list? Thank you. Link to list: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/cpu_list.php ID: 88255 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 1 Dec 05 Posts: 2124 Credit: 12,432,615 RAC: 1,727	Message 88277 - Posted: 13 Feb 2018, 11:41:46 UTC - in response to Message 88255. Can anyone tell me why the Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v2 @ 2.60GHz has such a higher score per clock and per computer on the cpu performance list? Thank you. That's strange. A 5 years old mid-high cpu is faster (gflops per core) than recent high-end cpu. Not 20% faster, it's ten time faster than a Xeon Gold 6134! ID: 88277 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

616westwarmoth Send message Joined: 7 Feb 18 Posts: 3 Credit: 21,196,142 RAC: 0	Message 88422 - Posted: 5 Mar 2018, 5:35:59 UTC The other big question is why do some CPU appear multiple times if running at the same frequency? ID: 88422 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

616westwarmoth Send message Joined: 7 Feb 18 Posts: 3 Credit: 21,196,142 RAC: 0	Message 88427 - Posted: 5 Mar 2018, 23:44:38 UTC - in response to Message 88422. The only theory I have is most of the double listing are CPU with Hyperthreading, So maybe the E5-2630 is high output when operating six "real" cores, and the lower output when operating on the "twelve" cores with six being the hyperthreads. ID: 88427 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Mike Send message Joined: 7 Feb 18 Posts: 5 Credit: 52,722,985 RAC: 0	Message 88430 - Posted: 6 Mar 2018, 2:48:31 UTC Last modified: 6 Mar 2018, 2:48:45 UTC I don't look at the rankings anymore. cpubenchmark.net has been more reliable for me. ID: 88430 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote